Here we will consider sampling a normal distribution
will be the random variable denoting the mean of the sample.
For the purposes of determining the density function of
We already know how to compute the moment generating function for a linear combination of independent random variables. That is, we have seen that if
Thus
Since the random variables
We have already determined the moment generating function for the normal random variable
This allows us to say that
The special thing about this is that the resulting moment generating function looks a lot like that of
Here are graphs of the density functions for

The above observation regarding the average of a sample from a normal random variable can be seen as a generalization of an easier fact.
Sum of Independent Normal Random Variables
Fact: Let
is a normal random variable, with mean
This can be seen by following the logic above. The moment generating functions for
respectively. Thus
is the moment generating function for
Here are a couple of computational examples.
Example: A standard normal random variable, (with density ), takes values in the interval , symmetric about its mean, with probability. If is the sample mean of twenty-five samples of , find the interval symmetric about its mean within which takes of its values.
Since
Example: If is standard normal random variable, how large must a sample be to ensure that takes of its values in ?
That is,
or
That is, we need a sample size of greater than
Here are a couple of ways that this might be used.
Example: Experience has shown that the melting point of a certain plastic is described by a normal distribution with mean and standard deviation . Twenty samples from a new production process are tested and found to have an average melting point of . What is the probability that a sample of this size from the original process will have average melting point less than ? Does the new process yield product as stable as the original process temperatures near to ?
We note that
That is, there is less than a
A reasonable conclusion is that the new process does not yield a plastic which is as stable as the old, at least when temperatures get above
Example: In the preceding example, the mean melting point of plastics produced by the new process needs to be determined to within with accuracy. Assuming that the standard deviation for the new process is , just as for the old process, how large of a sample is needed to obtain such accuracy?
We address the following mathematical question: for how large of an
That is,
or
Since
or
Thus we need a sample size of greater than
These examples should be compared with those encountered when we looked at Chebyshev’s theorem. In both cases, more control over the standard deviation of a probability density gives us tighter spread about the mean.